Cases pending on appellate grants
Cases pending on appellate grants
|Rodas, C.||B266633||ADJ8899793||Writ issued 11/12/2015|
-- -- Whether the Board correctly found that the death of a dishwasher who had a history of tuberculosis and was found dead from pulmonary hemorrhaging near a trash can and dumpster in his employer-restaurant’s parking lot, did not arise out of and occur in the course of employment.
|ADJ7167333||Supreme Court granted, transferred to
Court of Appeal 9/30/15, writ issued 10/28/15
-- -- Whether the Board erred in concluding that the California Insurance Guarantee Association is bound by a pre-liquidation stipulation between its bankrupt insurer and a solvent insurer re: contribution.
|Southard, S.||C079912||ADJ218782||Writ issued 10/2/2015|
-- Whether the Board correctly concluded that the time periods in Labor Code section 4610.6(d) are mandatory, and that if an IMR determination is not timely issued, the treatment dispute is not covered by Labor Code section 4610.5 and may be determined by the WCAB under Labor Code section 4604.
|Tavares, A.||H042244||ADJ8247302||Writ issued 9/14/2015|
-- Whether the Board correctly found that an employee's fatal heart attack, sustained in a restroom after he complained of chest pains while washing his tractor-trailer truck and before he was to be taken by his foreman for medical help, arose out of and occurred in the course of employment.
|Macklin, D.||B262759||ADJ7993918||Writ issued 5/19/2015|
-- Whether the Board properly found the California WCAB has jurisdiction to apportion liability for the cumulative trauma injury of a professional basketball player to an out-of-state employer (New York Knicks) based on the player's basketball activities in California while employed by the Knicks and other teams, including the Los Angeles Clippers and the Atlanta Hawks, notwithstanding Knicks' claim that the player's contact with California on behalf of the team was minimal.
|Ramirez, D.||C078440||ADJ6821103||Writ issued 5/13/2015|
-- Whether the Utilization Review (UR) and Independent Medical Review (IMR) process that resulted in denial of acupuncture treatments for a lower extremity injury under existing award violates the workers' compensation provisions of the California Constitution (Art. XIV, § 4) and applicant's right to due process under the California and U.S. Constitutions.
|Rice, C.||C078706||ADJ8701916||Writ issued 4/30/2015|
-- Whether the Board erred in rejecting the apportionment opinion of the panel Qualified Medical Evaluator, who found that 49% of the injured police officer’s neck disability was caused by genetic predisposition to degenerative disc disease, as demonstrated by his father’s medical history.
|Batten, M.||B260916||ADJ3781289||Writ issued 3/27/2015|
-- Whether the Board properly rescinded a permanent disability award that had been based on the report of a physician retained by applicant’s attorney as a “private medical consultant,” which report the Board found inadmissible pursuant to Labor Code section 4064(d).
|Dahl, D.||A141046||ADJ1310387||Writ issued 1/8/2015|
-- Whether the Board properly relied upon the opinion of a vocational expert retained by the injured employee to award 79% permanent disability for her neck and right shoulder injury, concluding that the opinion was substantial evidence to rebut the Diminished Future Earning Capacity component of the 2005 Schedule for Rating Permanent Disabilities.
|Gannon, C.||C077512||ADJ3296187||Writ issued 12/18/2014|
-- Whether the Board properly issued an award of 100% permanent disability based on the rating factor, derived from orthopedic AME’s opinion, that the employee’s injuries left her limited to working from inside the home.
|Stevens, F.||A143043||ADJ1526353||Writ issued 12/3/2014|
-- Whether Independent Medical Review under Lab. Code §§ 4610.5 & 4610.6, as instituted by the Legislature through Senate Bill 863, violates the injured employee's right to due process and the workers' compensation and separation of powers clauses of the California Constitution.