Cases pending on appellate grants
Cases pending on appellate grants 2014
|Kang, A.||B255839||ADJ7750590||Writ issued 7/22/2014|
-- Whether the Board properly relied upon the allegedly incomplete medical reports of a rheumatologist and a psychologist to find that applicant, who sustained an orthopedic industrial injury, also sustained industrial injury in the form of sleep disorder and to his psyche.
|Schultz, C.||B255678||ADJ7582920||Writ issued 7/16/2014|
-- Whether the Board properly found that the injuries of a technical drafter, sustained in a rollover accident while driving his personal car to work for a private employer at Edwards Air Force Base, were barred from compensation by the going and coming rule (i.e., not w/in course of employment) absent the “vehicle required at work” or other exception to the rule.
|Jones, E.||A141793||ADJ7076922||Writ issued 6/26/2014|
-- Whether the Board, in a series of decisions issued December 13, 2012, January 13, 2014 and April 4, 2014, properly made a final order awarding attorney’s fees to applicant under Labor Code section 4064(c), given the statute’s amendment by Senate Bill 863 effective January 1, 2013.
|Von Ritzhoff, K.||B254082||ADJ4599548, ADJ1414058||Writ issued 6/18/2014|
-- Whether the Board denied defendant due process in issuing a permanent total disability award in favor of a self-represented applicant who allegedly abused discovery, coerced medical examiners, and avoided cross-examination at trial.
|Larkin, J.||S216986||ADJ7191871||Supreme Court granted review 4/9/2014|
-- Whether the Court of Appeal (C065891) properly affirmed the Board’s decision that benefits provided under Labor Code section 4458.2 extend only to volunteer peace officers and not to regularly sworn, salaried peace officers.
|Garcia, M.||B242245||ADJ7781989||Writ issued 4/1/2014|
-- Whether the Board properly excluded the medical reports of the injured employee’s non-Medical Provider Network (MPN) physicians and found she sustained 2% permanent disability, based solely on the MPN physician’s permanent and stationary report.
|Magana, S.||D065072||ADJ2806916||Writ issued 3/28/2014|
-- In consolidated cases involving injuries and surgeries incurred before 2004, did the Board properly find that Elite Surgical Center, an Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC), is entitled to facility fees halfway between the 2004 Official Medical Fee Schedule (OMFS) for ASCs and the inpatient OMFS for hospitals in effect from April 13, 2001 through December 31, 2003?
|Clark, B.||S215637||ADJ7324566||Supreme Court granted review 3/19/2014|
-- Whether the Court of Appeal (D063945) properly reversed the Board’s finding that a carpenter’s unintentional death by overdose, partly due to industrially-prescribed medications, arose out of the carpenter’s admitted physical injury.
|Benavides, L.||B251487||ADJ4322447||Writ issued 1/17/2014|
-- Whether the Board properly denied injured worker’s petition to reopen/new and further disability because he should have known about a completed medical test that supported increased disability before he entered into the original Stipulated Award.
Cases pending on appellate grants 2013
|Young, D||C075047||ADJ8321113||Writ issued 12/12/2013|
-- Whether the Board properly found that the left knee injury of a correctional sergeant, injured at home performing jumping jacks, did not arise out of his employment per Lab. Code, § 3600(a)(9) and Ezzy v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 252 [48 Cal.Comp.Cases 611].
|Lappi, S||G048217||ADJ3256213||Writ issued 8/1/2013|
-- Whether the WCAB may order an in camera review of documents to determine whether they are protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine.
|Lantz, P||F065934||ADJ8004482||Review granted by S.C. 6/12/2013*|
-- Whether the Board properly found that the death of a correctional officer, killed in a car accident at 6:20 AM during his 85-mile commute home after working a second shift at state correctional facility, did not occur in the course of employment.
*The Supreme Court granted widow’s petition for review (S209756) and directed 5th District Court of Appeal to vacate its summary denial of widow’s writ petition (F065934) and issue writ of review.
Cases pending on appellate grants 2012
|Allen, T||C071912||ADJ3147570||Writ issued 11/1/12|
-- Whether the employer violated Labor Code section 132a (discrimination) by failing to reinstate applicant after her termination for work absences allegedly related to her industrial injury.