Cases pending on appellate grants
Cases pending on appellate grants
|Dahl, D.||A141046||ADJ1310387||Writ issued 1/8/2015|
-- Whether the Board properly relied upon the opinion of a vocational expert retained by the injured employee to award 79% permanent disability for her neck and right shoulder injury, concluding that the opinion was substantial evidence to rebut the Diminished Future Earning Capacity component of the 2005 Schedule for Rating Permanent Disabilities.
|Aleskerova, N.||B259627||ADJ3048900||Writ issued 12/31/2014|
-- Whether the Board properly disallowed the medical treatment lien of a psychologist for failure to prove the employee, who settled her disputed claim for a lump sum, sustained injury to her psyche arising out of and occurring in the course of employment.
|Gannon, C.||C077512||ADJ3296187||Writ issued 12/18/2014|
-- Whether the Board properly issued an award of 100% permanent disability based on the rating factor, derived from orthopedic AME’s opinion, that the employee’s injuries left her limited to working from inside the home.
|Stevens, F.||A143043||ADJ1526353||Writ issued 12/3/2014|
-- Whether Independent Medical Review under Lab. Code §§ 4610.5 & 4610.6, as instituted by the Legislature through Senate Bill 863, violates the injured employee’s right to due process and the workers’ compensation and separation of powers clauses of the California Constitution.
|Lozano, W.||B258000||ADJ8073877||Writ issued 11/10/2014|
-- Whether the Board properly found that a firefighter who served a U.S. Department of Defense (“DOD”) installation from 2001-2007 and died of stomach cancer in 2007 is not entitled to Labor Code § 3212.1’s presumption that the cancer was industrial, in light of the statute’s 2008 amendment of subdivision (a)(2), effective January 1, 2009, to include “active firefighting members of a fire department that serves a [U.S. DOD] installation and who are certified by the [DOD] as meeting its standards for firefighters.”
|Powell, P.||A141429||ADJ8710988||Writ issued 10/15/2014|
-- Whether the Board, in rating permanent disability for upper extremities injury of a manager who used extensive computer keyboarding to carry out his managerial tasks, properly rejected the “dual occupation doctrine” and found him to be within occupational group 212 (mostly professional occupations) and not 112 (mostly clerical occupations).
|Kang, A.||B255839||ADJ7750590||Writ issued 7/22/2014|
-- Whether the Board properly relied upon the allegedly incomplete medical reports of a rheumatologist and a psychologist to find that applicant, who sustained an orthopedic industrial injury, also sustained industrial injury in the form of sleep disorder and to his psyche.
|Schultz, C.||B255678||ADJ7582920||Writ issued 7/16/2014|
-- Whether the Board properly found that the injuries of a technical drafter, sustained in a rollover accident while driving his personal car to work for a private employer at Edwards Air Force Base, were barred from compensation by the going and coming rule (i.e., not w/in course of employment) absent the “vehicle required at work” or other exception to the rule.
|Von Ritzhoff, K.||B254082||ADJ4599548, ADJ1414058||Writ issued 6/18/2014|
-- Whether the Board denied defendant due process in issuing a permanent total disability award in favor of a self-represented applicant who allegedly abused discovery, coerced medical examiners, and avoided cross-examination at trial.
|Larkin, J.||S216986||ADJ7191871||Supreme Court granted review 4/9/2014|
-- Whether the Court of Appeal (C065891) properly affirmed the Board’s decision that benefits provided under Labor Code section 4458.2 extend only to volunteer peace officers and not to regularly sworn, salaried peace officers.
|Magana, S.||D065072||ADJ2806916||Writ issued 3/28/2014|
-- In consolidated cases involving injuries and surgeries incurred before 2004, did the Board properly find that Elite Surgical Center, an Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC), is entitled to facility fees halfway between the 2004 Official Medical Fee Schedule (OMFS) for ASCs and the inpatient OMFS for hospitals in effect from April 13, 2001 through December 31, 2003?
|Clark, B.||S215637||ADJ7324566||Supreme Court granted review 3/19/2014|
-- Whether the Court of Appeal (D063945) properly reversed the Board’s finding that a carpenter’s unintentional death by overdose, partly due to industrially-prescribed medications, arose out of the carpenter’s admitted physical injury.