Cases pending on appellate grants
Cases pending on appellate grants 2014
|Bigelow, D.||A140531||ADJ7949972||Writ issued 2/6/2014|
--Whether the Board properly found that defendant City of Paso Robles failed to rebut the industrial cancer presumption of Labor Code section 3212.2 for a police officer who developed colon cancer after four years on the force, where PQME used studies of other types of cancer to propose a latency period of 15-20 years for colon cancer.
|Benavides, L.||B251487||ADJ4322447||Writ issued 1/17/2014|
--Whether the Board properly denied injured worker’s petition to reopen/new and further disability because he should have known about a completed medical test that supported increased disability before he entered into the original Stipulated Award.
Cases pending on appellate grants 2013
|Young, D||C075047||ADJ8321113||Writ issued 12/12/2013|
--Whether the Board properly found that the left knee injury of a correctional sergeant, injured at home performing jumping jacks, did not arise out of his employment per Lab. Code, § 3600(a)(9) and Ezzy v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 252 [48 Cal.Comp.Cases 611].
|Johnson, A||B249201||ADJ7224961||Writ issued 9/10/2013|
--Whether the Board properly found that it has jurisdiction over the cumulative trauma claim of a pro basketball player, employed by a Connecticut-based team, based on the player?s allegedly minimal playing time in California.
|Lade, D||C074133||ADJ8213231||Writ issued 8/23/2013|
--Whether the Board properly found that an industrially-injured deputy sheriff, who had worked an evening shift for years and was paid a 5% shift differential, was entitled to the differential as part of his Lab. Code 4850 benefits while working a day shift on light or modified duty.
|Clark, B||D063945||ADJ7324566||Writ issued 8/14/2013|
--Whether the Board properly found that a carpenter?s unintentional death by overdose, partly due to industrially-prescribed medications, arose out of the carpenter?s admitted physical injury.
|Lappi, S||G048217||ADJ3256213||Writ issued 8/1/2013|
-- Whether the WCAB may order an in camera review of documents to determine whether they are protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine.
|Lantz, P||F065934||ADJ8004482||Review granted by S.C. 6/12/2013*|
--Whether the Board properly found that the death of a correctional officer, killed in a car accident at 6:20 AM during his 85-mile commute home after working a second shift at state correctional facility, did not occur in the course of employment.
*The Supreme Court granted widow?s petition for review (S209756) and directed 5th District Court of Appeal to vacate its summary denial of widow?s writ petition (F065934) and issue writ of review.
Cases pending on appellate grants 2012
|Allen, T||C071912||ADJ3147570||Writ issued 11/1/12|
--Whether the employer violated Labor Code section 132a (discrimination) by failing to reinstate applicant after her termination for work absences allegedly related to her industrial injury.