Commission on Health and Safety and
Workers’ Compensation
August 1999
This
report was prepared in response to the joint request from Senator Hilda Solis
and Assembly Member Jack Scott that the Commission prepare background
information on the impact of the reform legislation on workers’ compensation
costs to employers and benefits to injured workers.
The
1993 reforms instituted several changes that had a significant impact on costs
and benefits:
·
Abolished
minimum rate law for Workers’ Compensation insurance premiums
·
Increased
Temporary Disability (TD) and Permanent Disability (PD) benefit levels
·
Instituted
medical cost containment
-
Managed
care
-
Fee Schedule
reform
-
Restrictions
on mental stress claims
-
Promotion
of the role of the Primary Treating Physician
·
Capped
Vocational Rehabilitation benefits at $16,000
·
Implemented
the Cal-OSHA High-Hazard Targeted Inspection Program and Loss Control
Certification Program
·
Established
anti-fraud protections
·
Provided a
‘carve-out’ option for the construction industry for alternative workers’
compensation programs
·
Created the
Commission on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation (CHSWC)
In
a changing environment, it is difficult to isolate the impact of the
reforms. Since the reforms were
enacted, there are numerous other variables that also affect costs and benefits
significantly, such as changes in the economy and wage rates. For example, from January 1993 to May 1999,
the unemployment rate in California has fallen from 9.7% to 5.2%, while wages
in manufacturing have increased about 18%.
A decline in workers’ compensation injuries and claims frequency has
also been observed nationally.
To isolate the savings to
employers and benefits to workers due to the 1993 reforms would require a more
extensive study than time and resources permit. A comprehensive study would use multiple approaches to
cross-check estimates, adopt a study design that accounts for simultaneous
changes unrelated to reforms, and would incorporate information from state and
national data that are not readily available to CHSWC. Given this, it is highly recommended that
this accounting of workers’ compensation costs and benefits subsequent to the
reforms be cited and utilized with caution.
It
is difficult to estimate with certainty the savings for employers. The Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating
Bureau, in the “WCIRB Bulletin No. 99-01” published on March 16, 1999, provides
two estimates of changes in employer costs between 1992 and 1998. Neither estimate attempts to isolate the
impact of the 1993 legislative reforms.
The
WCIRB estimated that insured California employers saved $2.8 billion in workers’
compensation net premium costs in 1998 when compared to 1992. However, this drop in premium costs may be
due to factors other than the reforms, including changes in injury frequency,
prior cost reductions, and insurer expectations of future losses based on past
experience. Moreover, many believe that
the workers’ compensation premiums since ‘open rating’ do not represent actual
costs during that period, but are reflective of pricing competition and the
transitional nature of the current market.
Note that this WCIRB estimate of premium savings does not include
self-insured employers.
The
WCIRB estimates that the costs of medical and indemnity benefits paid to
injured workers of insured employers was $0.9 billion less in 1998 than
1992. Again, this reduction could be
due to many factors, including the 1993 reforms and changes in the
economy. By extrapolation, the WCIRB
then estimates that reductions in benefit costs for all employers (both insured
and self-insured) was approximately $1.3 billion in 1998 when compared to 1992.
The
Commission utilized the WCIRB estimates as a basis for further analysis that
attempts to assess the impact of the 1993 reforms on workers’ compensation cost
savings for all California employers, both insured and self-insured.
Frank Neuhauser of the Survey Research
Center of UC Berkeley made modifications to the WCIRB data which
·
incorporated
labor force growth and changes in wage rates since 1992
·
adjusted
the WCIRB baseline to more closely correspond to the beginning of the reform
period and
·
incorporated
improved estimates of premium savings to insured employers from open
rating.
Mr.
Neuhauser’s analysis estimates that the savings to all California employers due
to the results of the reforms were approximately $1.3 billion in 1998.
Mr. Neuhauser’s
methodology and estimates of reform savings for employers are displayed on
Table 1 on the following page.
|
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998[i] |
|
Expected
premium cost under pre open rating
conditions (Av.
Prem./expected loss = 1.35) |
|
$6.06 billion |
$6.99 billion |
$8.01 billion |
$8.01 billion |
|
Expected premium cost under post open
rating conditions[ii] (Av.
Prem./expected
loss = 1.15) |
(Open rating not yet
in effect) |
$5.20 billion |
$6.00 billion |
$6.86 billion |
$6.86 billion |
|
Savings on
premium cost as a result of open rating (calculated for insured employers only) |
$0 |
$0.88 billion |
$0.99 billion |
$1.14 billion |
$1.14 billion |
|
Savings
on premium cost as a result of benefit cost savings.[iii] |
$0.7 billion |
$0.7 billion |
$0.7 billion |
$0.7 billion |
$0.7 billion |
|
Total cost
savings each year (Before
increases to TD and PD rates) (Includes
an adjustment for self-insured employers) |
$0.7 billion |
$1.58 billion |
$1.69 billion |
$1.84 billion |
$1.84 billion |
|
Impact
of TD & PD benefit increases on employer cost savings each year. |
($0.098 billion) |
($0.255 billion) |
($0.375 billion) |
($0.454 billion) |
($0.474 billion) |
|
Total cost
savings each year (After
increases to TD and PD rates) |
$0.602 billion |
$1.325 billion |
$1.315 billion |
$1.386 billion |
$1.386 billion |
|
Cumulative
cost savings for California
employers |
$0.602 billion |
$1.927 billion |
$3.242 billion |
$4.628 billion |
$6.014 billion |
Estimated
Changes in Worker Benefits:
Frank
Neuhauser of the Survey Research Center of UC Berkeley, with some discussions
with David Bellusci of the WCIRB, developed the estimates of changes in worker
benefits. Data were derived from the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating
Bureau of California (WCIRB) and from the California Workers’ Compensation
Institute’s (CWCI) Industry Claims Information System (ICIS) system.
The
1993 reforms made several adjustments to the levels of benefits that are
received by injured workers. Temporary Disability Benefits (TTD) were raised
for workers with relatively high average weekly wages. The reforms also increased the maximum
weekly permanent disability payments to disabled workers with impairments rated
at greater than 15%.
Table
2 below includes the impact of the growth in average wages (derived from the
Labor Market Information Division of the Employment Development Department) and
incorporates several assumptions about the impact of the reform legislation on
possible increases in utilization. For
further details, see the working paper by Frank Neuhauser entitled “Impact
of the 1993 Reforms on Payments of Temporary and Permanent Disability,”
available from CHSWC.
Table
2 shows that by 1998, workers received an increase in temporary disability
benefits of $198 million and in permanent disability benefits of $276
million. Thus the total increases in
benefits to workers from the TD and PD benefit increases in the 1993 reforms (line
3) equals $474 million in 1998.
These
estimates of employee benefits do not take into account reductions in injuries
that may have occurred as a result of the reforms. The WCIRB estimates (as
of September 30, 1998) that the indemnity claim frequency for employees of
insured employers dropped from 58 per million on-level premium dollars in
1991 to 35 per million on-level premium dollars in 1998.
These reductions may be driven by heightened safety efforts motivated
by targeted inspections or by the higher TD benefits required under the legislation. Reductions in injuries are counted as savings
to employers, but they also represent a significant benefit to workers.
The
table also reports estimates (adapted from the WCIRB estimates) of the impact
of several changes in compensability adopted in the 1993 reforms. We estimate that these changes reduced
employer costs by $500 million per year. The changes include capping vocational
rehabilitation, eliminating post-termination claims, and restricting
psychiatric claims. If the full amount were to be counted as a reduction in
benefits to workers, the total payments to workers in each year would be
negative. Between 1994 and 1998, the
cumulative reduction in benefits to workers would be $844 million, as reported
in the last line of the table.
However,
the changes in compensability should not be counted equally with the changes in
TD and PD benefits. These changes were
made to remedy perceived excesses in the pre-reform system. In particular, it was believed that benefits
were not being paid to the appropriate injured workers. If the changes reduced benefits to workers
who did not deserve them in the first place, this should not be counted. Since evaluating whether these changes
improved the targeting of benefits in California is beyond the scope of this
report, we suggest simply that the total of $500 million is an overestimate of
the benefit reduction associated with the changes in compensability.
Since
we cannot determine what fraction of the change in compensability represents a
reduction in benefits to workers, we conclude that -$26[iv]
million is a lower bound on the benefits to workers attributable to the reforms
in 1998. The upper bound is $474
million, which is directly attributable to changes in PD and TD.
|
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
|
Increases
in Temporary Disability |
$43 million |
$107 million |
$153 million |
$187 million |
$198 million |
|
Increases in Permanent Disability |
$55 million |
$148 million |
$222 million |
$267 million |
$276 million |
|
Total
TD+PD benefit increases for each year. |
$98 million |
$255 million |
$375 million |
$454 million |
$474 million |
|
Legislative
changes in compensability: restrictions on vocational rehabilitation,
psychiatric injuries, and post-termination claims.[v] |
($500 million) |
($500 million) |
($500 million) |
($500 million) |
($500 million) |
|
Net
benefit change (decrease) each year |
($402 million) |
($245 million) |
($125 million) |
($46 million) |
($26 million) |
|
Cumulative
benefit change (decrease) since 1994 |
($402 million) |
($647 million) |
($772 million) |
($818 million) |
($844 million) |
Our summary of relevant analyses indicate
that there have been significant changes in both costs and benefits:
·
Employer
savings from the 1993 reforms are estimated to be between $1.3 billion and $2.8
billion in 1998[vi].
· Increased benefits to injured workers in 1998 are estimated to be between -$26 million and $474 million.
The large range in both estimates illustrates the difficulty associated with this exercise. The data are subject to multiple interpretations, and the assumptions behind the estimates are controversial. Any estimate of either employer savings or benefits to injured workers must be treated cautiously, including those cited in this report.
The
legislative reforms of the 1990’s made significant modifications and additions
to the health, safety and workers’ compensation systems in California. Since its inception in 1994, the Commission
on Health and Safety and Workers’ Compensation, established by the reforms, has
been engaged in ongoing evaluations of these critical programs.
Information
gathered through CHSWC meetings and projects indicate that the reforms have
improved the system in some areas.
Workers’ compensation premiums and the number of claims have decreased;
medical-legal costs have fallen sharply; and abusive claims practices have been
reduced.
However,
serious problems linger. Many
stakeholders agree that the system remains excessively complex and delivers
modest benefits at high costs. CHSWC
and the community recognize that these difficulties adversely affect employers,
employees and all parties involved with the system.
The
CHSWC ‘Permanent Disability Study’, an ongoing project by RAND under contract
with the Commission, also looks at outcomes for injured workers. The initial RAND study found that workers of
insured employers who suffer workplace injuries resulting in a permanent
disability experience large and sustained wage losses.
Researchers concluded that the permanent partial disability benefits, on average, compensate 40 percent of those lost wages. Severely disabled workers, prior to benefit increases legislated in 1993, had approximately two-thirds of their wage loss replaced. Contrary to the expectations of policymakers, those workers suffering less serious disabilities also have large wage losses, but wage loss replacement rates are as low as twelve percent. It is important to note that these results were obtained during a period of economic recession in California.
The CHSWC
Permanent Disability Policy Advisory Committee – composed of CHSWC members
representing employers and labor and interested members of the workers’
compensation community – was formed
to make recommendations on further action and future direction of the
Commission’s efforts. The PD Policy
Advisory Committee adopted the following goals:
§
Efficiently
decrease uncompensated wage loss for disabled workers in California.
§
Increase
the number of injured workers promptly returning to sustained work.
§
Reduce
transaction and friction costs, including “costs” to injured workers.
The
CHSWC Permanent Disability Study is continuing in several areas, including data
gathering and analyses of wage-loss and replacement rates of injured workers of
self-insured employers and impact of the economy on those rates. Future activities will include suggesting
revisions to the Permanent Disability Rating Schedule with respect to the
economic consequences sustained by permanently disabled workers.
The
CHSWC Permanent Disability study will provide considerable data on the adequacy
and equity of indemnity benefits for injured workers in California. While not yet complete, these estimates and
the methodologies developed to obtain them will provide a critical tool to
improve the targeting of benefits to workers with the largest wage losses in
California.
CHSWC
believes that further improvements can and need to be made to achieve optimum
system performance to serve all of the employees, employers and taxpayers in
California. CHSWC looks forward to
continuing its work with the community in striving to fulfill these goals.
The
WCIRB Bulletin No. 99-01 entitled “Evaluation of the Impact of the 1993
Legislative Changes on Pure Premium Rates” formed the basis for deriving the
cost savings estimates.
The report by Frank Neuhauser of UC Berkeley entitled “Impact of the 1993 Reforms on Payments of Temporary and Permanent Disability” discusses the effect of these adjustments on the amount of indemnity payments made to injured workers in each year since reform.
The
Commission’s reports of studies and projects and its annual report are
accessible on the web at www.dir.ca.gov. From the Department of Industrial Relations’ home page, select
‘workers’ compensation’ or ‘occupational safety and health’ and then the
Commission. Printed copies of reports
are available by contacting the Commission office.
[ii] ‘Expected premium under post open rating
conditions’ includes adjustments for increases in employee earnings, increases
in employment levels, employee benefit increases, decreases in claim frequency,
and increases in average cost per claim.
[iii] The 1993 reforms such as limits on
medical-legal evaluations, limits on stress claims, and the cap on vocational
rehabilitation benefits resulted in savings to employers of approximately $500
million per year starting in 1994. (See
the following endnote.) In addition,
there were approximately $200 million in savings attributable to other factors
such as anti-fraud efforts, changes in medical-legal costs, and fee schedules.
[iv] Based on a calculation using the benefit estimate of $474 million and 100% of the benefit reductions.
[v] After adjusting the WCIRB estimates to
reflect 1998 labor market conditions, our analysis shows estimated benefit
reductions of $260 million (Vocational Rehabilitation), $195 million
(Psychiatric Claims) and $52 million (Post Termination Claims) for a total of
$507 million. We use an estimate of
$500 million in benefit reduction each year.
We note that employment terminations may have decreased due to
improvements in the economy.
This
calculation takes the dollar savings per worker, multiplies the saving by the
number of covered full-time equivalents for 1992, multiplies that by the growth
in the labor force (1992-1998), times 1.5 for the portion of the workforce
covered by self-insurance.
For
example, for Vocational Rehabilitation:
$20 (WCIRB estimate of VR savings/worker) * 7.8 million (FTE
1992) * 1.11 (11% growth in labor force) * 1.5 (WCIRB estimate that
self-insurers represent 1/3 of market) =
$20 * 7.8
million * 1.11 * 1.5 = $260 million
[vi] $2.8 billion was chosen as an upper
bound for the estimate of employer savings.
This WCIRB estimate includes factors outside the reform, but it also
does not include the self-insured.
Given that we do not expect that the self-insured had the same savings
as the insured, and that the self-insured are less than half the number of
injuries as the insured, we expect that the factors outside of the reforms
(declining injuries, economy, etc.) at least cancel and most likely outweigh
the omission of the self-insured.
Therefore, we regard this as an upper bound.